<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 59 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399085</link>
    <description>The court held that the freezing of the Petitioner&#039;s bank account was premature and unjustified as no adjudication or determination of the amount due had occurred. Consequently, the court directed the Respondents to withdraw the restraint on the account and allowed the Writ Petition, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 59 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399085</link>
      <description>The court held that the freezing of the Petitioner&#039;s bank account was premature and unjustified as no adjudication or determination of the amount due had occurred. Consequently, the court directed the Respondents to withdraw the restraint on the account and allowed the Writ Petition, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>