<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 57 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399083</link>
    <description>The appellant is entitled to Cenvat credit on disputed services up to 31.03.2011. For the period post-01.04.2011, the matter is remanded to quantify credit availed for personal use/benefit of employees. The appeal is allowed, setting aside the impugned order that required direct nexus/correlation between input and exported output services. The matter is remanded to the original authority to determine compliance with the formula under Rule 5.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2021 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 57 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399083</link>
      <description>The appellant is entitled to Cenvat credit on disputed services up to 31.03.2011. For the period post-01.04.2011, the matter is remanded to quantify credit availed for personal use/benefit of employees. The appeal is allowed, setting aside the impugned order that required direct nexus/correlation between input and exported output services. The matter is remanded to the original authority to determine compliance with the formula under Rule 5.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>