<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 52 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399078</link>
    <description>The revision was not entertained because of the small tax effect, and it was disposed of on that ground. The proposed question concerning admission of additional evidence at the appellate stage was not decided, and the question of law was left open for consideration in an appropriate case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2020 11:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 52 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399078</link>
      <description>The revision was not entertained because of the small tax effect, and it was disposed of on that ground. The proposed question concerning admission of additional evidence at the appellate stage was not decided, and the question of law was left open for consideration in an appropriate case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>