<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1846 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290515</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, setting aside the previous ITAT orders. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, allowing the assessee or liquidator to present their case on treating the machinery replacement expenditure as revenue expenditure. The substantial question of law remained open, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1846 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290515</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, setting aside the previous ITAT orders. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, allowing the assessee or liquidator to present their case on treating the machinery replacement expenditure as revenue expenditure. The substantial question of law remained open, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>