<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 38 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23386</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner is entitled to seek adjustment of capital gains against the purchase of the Kalpana flat. The petition was successful, and the rule was made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (d), with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 38 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23386</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner is entitled to seek adjustment of capital gains against the purchase of the Kalpana flat. The petition was successful, and the rule was made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (b) and (d), with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>