<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 40 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399066</link>
    <description>The court set aside the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the order rejecting objections to the assessment reopening. The court ruled that the reopening was not based on new material facts but on a change of opinion, which lacked jurisdiction. The transfer of shares as a gift was found valid and exempt from capital gains tax under section 47(iii). The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 40 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399066</link>
      <description>The court set aside the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the order rejecting objections to the assessment reopening. The court ruled that the reopening was not based on new material facts but on a change of opinion, which lacked jurisdiction. The transfer of shares as a gift was found valid and exempt from capital gains tax under section 47(iii). The writ petition was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>