<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 35 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399061</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside all Tribunal orders for AY 2001-02, 2003-04, and 2004-05, and remanded the matter back to the Assessing Authority for a de novo assessment. The Assessing Authority was directed to reassess the capital gains tax liability without the Assessee being able to challenge it on the ground of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 35 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399061</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside all Tribunal orders for AY 2001-02, 2003-04, and 2004-05, and remanded the matter back to the Assessing Authority for a de novo assessment. The Assessing Authority was directed to reassess the capital gains tax liability without the Assessee being able to challenge it on the ground of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>