<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 27 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders. It directed the Assessing Officer to tax the entire surrendered income of Rs. 3.64 crores at the normal rate, rejecting the separate taxation of Rs. 1.00 crore under section 69 and the imposition of tax under section 115BBE. Additionally, the Tribunal annulled the direction to tax Rs. 2.64 crores under section 115BBE, highlighting the lack of power to remand the issue back to the A.O.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 27 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders. It directed the Assessing Officer to tax the entire surrendered income of Rs. 3.64 crores at the normal rate, rejecting the separate taxation of Rs. 1.00 crore under section 69 and the imposition of tax under section 115BBE. Additionally, the Tribunal annulled the direction to tax Rs. 2.64 crores under section 115BBE, highlighting the lack of power to remand the issue back to the A.O.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>