<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 42 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23379</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of with directions to the Income-tax Officer to consider the taxpayer&#039;s representation, give effect to the appellate order by adjusting refund and recovery, and issue a revised notice of demand after disposal of the representation. The court also directed maintenance of status quo over the seized bank account for the specified period, preserving the existing position until the stated conditions were addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:20:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 42 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23379</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of with directions to the Income-tax Officer to consider the taxpayer&#039;s representation, give effect to the appellate order by adjusting refund and recovery, and issue a revised notice of demand after disposal of the representation. The court also directed maintenance of status quo over the seized bank account for the specified period, preserving the existing position until the stated conditions were addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>