<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 731 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290506</link>
    <description>Family settlement memoranda that merely record an earlier concluded and acted-upon arrangement do not themselves create or extinguish rights in immovable property and therefore do not require compulsory registration. This differs from an instrument that first embodies and creates the terms of a fresh family arrangement. Where relatives have implemented the settlement through reciprocal transfers and changes in possession, the equitable principle supporting bona fide family arrangements applies. A party that has accepted benefits under such an arrangement is estopped from later denying or resiling from it. Interference in second appeal must also remain within the limited scope prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 11:03:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 731 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290506</link>
      <description>Family settlement memoranda that merely record an earlier concluded and acted-upon arrangement do not themselves create or extinguish rights in immovable property and therefore do not require compulsory registration. This differs from an instrument that first embodies and creates the terms of a fresh family arrangement. Where relatives have implemented the settlement through reciprocal transfers and changes in possession, the equitable principle supporting bona fide family arrangements applies. A party that has accepted benefits under such an arrangement is estopped from later denying or resiling from it. Interference in second appeal must also remain within the limited scope prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>