<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 293 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23376</link>
    <description>The High Court of Kerala ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that they qualified as an industrial company under section 2(6)(c) of the Finance Act, 1972. Despite the Income-tax Officer&#039;s initial assessment that the assessee did not conduct a significant portion of processing work themselves, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and Tribunal found that the processing of raw cashew nuts by the assessee, even through outside agencies, constituted an industrial activity. The Court emphasized that the direct payment of processing charges to outside agencies demonstrated substantial engagement in processing activities, aligning with the definition of an industrial company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:12:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 293 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23376</link>
      <description>The High Court of Kerala ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that they qualified as an industrial company under section 2(6)(c) of the Finance Act, 1972. Despite the Income-tax Officer&#039;s initial assessment that the assessee did not conduct a significant portion of processing work themselves, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and Tribunal found that the processing of raw cashew nuts by the assessee, even through outside agencies, constituted an industrial activity. The Court emphasized that the direct payment of processing charges to outside agencies demonstrated substantial engagement in processing activities, aligning with the definition of an industrial company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>