https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23373 Chapter XXC requires the Appropriate Authority to act strictly within the statutory pre-emptive purchase framework. It cannot treat Form No. 37-I as premature or invalid merely because of conjectural future contingencies under another statute when the transferor has a saleable title and the competent urban land authority has already granted the relevant permission or no-objection for construction. A later withdrawal possibility was held too vague to justify postponing action, and no implied or ancillary power exists to keep the matter in abeyance on prematurity grounds. The impugned refusal was unsustainable, and the matter had to be reconsidered in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 18 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:04:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23373 Chapter XXC requires the Appropriate Authority to act strictly within the statutory pre-emptive purchase framework. It cannot treat Form No. 37-I as premature or invalid merely because of conjectural future contingencies under another statute when the transferor has a saleable title and the competent urban land authority has already granted the relevant permission or no-objection for construction. A later withdrawal possibility was held too vague to justify postponing action, and no implied or ancillary power exists to keep the matter in abeyance on prematurity grounds. The impugned refusal was unsustainable, and the matter had to be reconsidered in accordance with law. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 18 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23373