<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1139 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399020</link>
    <description>The High Court criticized the Tribunal&#039;s order for lacking reasons and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing that an order should stand or fall based on the reasons contained in it. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, highlighting the importance of providing detailed reasons in judicial orders to avoid prejudice to any party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1139 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399020</link>
      <description>The High Court criticized the Tribunal&#039;s order for lacking reasons and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing that an order should stand or fall based on the reasons contained in it. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, highlighting the importance of providing detailed reasons in judicial orders to avoid prejudice to any party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>