<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1138 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399019</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming eligibility for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act. The court held that unaccounted money found during search proceedings constituted business income, allowing for the deduction. Transactions entered into before the introduction of certain clauses were also deemed eligible for deduction. The court interpreted clauses (e) and (f) as prospective, applying to transactions made after a specific date. Additionally, income discovered during search proceedings was correctly treated as business income. The appeal was dismissed, supporting the assessee&#039;s position on all legal issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:28:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1138 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399019</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming eligibility for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act. The court held that unaccounted money found during search proceedings constituted business income, allowing for the deduction. Transactions entered into before the introduction of certain clauses were also deemed eligible for deduction. The court interpreted clauses (e) and (f) as prospective, applying to transactions made after a specific date. Additionally, income discovered during search proceedings was correctly treated as business income. The appeal was dismissed, supporting the assessee&#039;s position on all legal issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>