<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1135 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399016</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the department&#039;s order designating a retired Director as a Principal Officer under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner was directed to provide details of acting Directors for further assessment proceedings, and the department was granted liberty to proceed against any acting Director as the Principal Officer. The Court disposed of the Writ Petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1135 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399016</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the department&#039;s order designating a retired Director as a Principal Officer under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner was directed to provide details of acting Directors for further assessment proceedings, and the department was granted liberty to proceed against any acting Director as the Principal Officer. The Court disposed of the Writ Petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>