<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1127 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the Rs. 50 lakhs addition to the sale consideration. It found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition was based on presumption without sufficient corroborative evidence, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper verification and the need for corroborative evidence before making such additions in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:05:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1127 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the Rs. 50 lakhs addition to the sale consideration. It found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition was based on presumption without sufficient corroborative evidence, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper verification and the need for corroborative evidence before making such additions in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>