<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1126 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399007</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 for reexamination of unsecured loans and sundry creditors, but deemed the direction for further verification of stock valuation unjustified. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the necessity for thorough inquiries by the AO in assessing liabilities and assets as required by the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:05:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1126 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399007</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 for reexamination of unsecured loans and sundry creditors, but deemed the direction for further verification of stock valuation unjustified. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the necessity for thorough inquiries by the AO in assessing liabilities and assets as required by the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>