<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1125 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399006</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on improper service of notice under Section 148, rendering the assessment proceedings null and void. The Tribunal did not address the addition under Section 69 but emphasized the importance of serving notices to the address listed in the PAN database, as per Supreme Court and High Court precedents. The Tribunal dismissed other grounds raised by the assessee, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s compliance with due process in issuing the notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 13:03:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1125 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399006</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on improper service of notice under Section 148, rendering the assessment proceedings null and void. The Tribunal did not address the addition under Section 69 but emphasized the importance of serving notices to the address listed in the PAN database, as per Supreme Court and High Court precedents. The Tribunal dismissed other grounds raised by the assessee, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s compliance with due process in issuing the notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>