<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 1 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23364</link>
    <description>The High Court of Rajasthan ruled in favor of the Revenue in a case concerning deduction under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that borrowed money should not be considered as part of the capital employed in a new industrial undertaking, citing the precedent set in the Supreme Court case of Lohia Machines Ltd. v. Union of India [1985] 152 ITR 308. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:06:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 1 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23364</link>
      <description>The High Court of Rajasthan ruled in favor of the Revenue in a case concerning deduction under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that borrowed money should not be considered as part of the capital employed in a new industrial undertaking, citing the precedent set in the Supreme Court case of Lohia Machines Ltd. v. Union of India [1985] 152 ITR 308. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>