https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399002 The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking direction for implementing a final order of the CESTAT, Ext.P7, as the respondent expressed intent to file a statutory appeal within the six-month period allowed by the Customs Act. Emphasizing the statutory appeal process, the Court refused to compel immediate compliance with Ext.P7, stating coercive enforcement before the appeal period lapses is impermissible. Cautioning against premature contempt actions, the Court declined to issue peremptory directions, deeming the petition premature and dismissing it. en-us Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399002 The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking direction for implementing a final order of the CESTAT, Ext.P7, as the respondent expressed intent to file a statutory appeal within the six-month period allowed by the Customs Act. Emphasizing the statutory appeal process, the Court refused to compel immediate compliance with Ext.P7, stating coercive enforcement before the appeal period lapses is impermissible. Cautioning against premature contempt actions, the Court declined to issue peremptory directions, deeming the petition premature and dismissing it. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399002