<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2022 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290486</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay and noted that the issue raised in the Special Leave Petition was already covered by its earlier judgment in Civil Appeal Nos. 8489-8490 of 2013. On that basis, the petitioner fairly conceded that the petition was liable to be dismissed, and the Special Leave Petition was dismissed. Pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 08:14:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2022 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290486</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay and noted that the issue raised in the Special Leave Petition was already covered by its earlier judgment in Civil Appeal Nos. 8489-8490 of 2013. On that basis, the petitioner fairly conceded that the petition was liable to be dismissed, and the Special Leave Petition was dismissed. Pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>