https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290480 The Federal Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's interpretation of the lease clause to mean annual rent and affirming the High Court's decision to grant relief to non-appealing proprietors under Order 41, Rule 33, CPC. The court did not decide on the competency of the appeal to the Privy Council, as it was not crucial to the case's resolution. en-us Mon, 24 Jan 1949 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:01:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290480 The Federal Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's interpretation of the lease clause to mean annual rent and affirming the High Court's decision to grant relief to non-appealing proprietors under Order 41, Rule 33, CPC. The court did not decide on the competency of the appeal to the Privy Council, as it was not crucial to the case's resolution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Jan 1949 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290480