<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>U/S 143(3) RWS 147 OF IT ACT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116757</link>
    <description>The taxpayer received a reassessment notice dispatched within four years but received after four years; the officer rejected the return and issued an order under reassessment provisions. The key issue is whether a limitation objection to the notice may be raised before the appellate tribunal when representatives did not object earlier, considering the dispatch versus receipt distinction, deemed service rules and potential waiver by appearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 21:49:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>U/S 143(3) RWS 147 OF IT ACT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116757</link>
      <description>The taxpayer received a reassessment notice dispatched within four years but received after four years; the officer rejected the return and issued an order under reassessment provisions. The key issue is whether a limitation objection to the notice may be raised before the appellate tribunal when representatives did not object earlier, considering the dispatch versus receipt distinction, deemed service rules and potential waiver by appearance.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 21:49:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>