<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1266 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290479</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction u/s 80IB(10) for the assessment year 2006-07, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The case involved a real estate developer claiming a deduction for profits from housing projects, with the AO initially disallowing the deduction due to deviations from the sanctioned plan. The Tribunal, referencing earlier decisions, ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the project qualified as a housing project and proportionate deduction was not relevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:04:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1266 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290479</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction u/s 80IB(10) for the assessment year 2006-07, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The case involved a real estate developer claiming a deduction for profits from housing projects, with the AO initially disallowing the deduction due to deviations from the sanctioned plan. The Tribunal, referencing earlier decisions, ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the project qualified as a housing project and proportionate deduction was not relevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>