https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398986 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the release of seized goods upon payment of specified tax and a 100% penalty under Section 129(1)(a) of the Act. The petitioner was also required to provide security other than cash or a bank guarantee for the remaining amount. The Court emphasized the importance of establishing a GST Tribunal for effective resolution of such matters and instructed the State counsel to provide a timeline for the Tribunal's constitution. The case is set for further proceedings upon the resumption of regular publication, indicating ongoing legal actions for a comprehensive resolution. en-us Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:01:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398986 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the release of seized goods upon payment of specified tax and a 100% penalty under Section 129(1)(a) of the Act. The petitioner was also required to provide security other than cash or a bank guarantee for the remaining amount. The Court emphasized the importance of establishing a GST Tribunal for effective resolution of such matters and instructed the State counsel to provide a timeline for the Tribunal's constitution. The case is set for further proceedings upon the resumption of regular publication, indicating ongoing legal actions for a comprehensive resolution. Case-Laws GST Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398986