https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398985 The Appellate Authority upheld the ruling that the services provided by the Appellant were not classified as Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services but rather as "rental services of transport vehicles." Consequently, the Appellant was not entitled to charge GST at 12% under the forward charge mechanism. The appeal filed by the Appellant was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Maharashtra Advance Ruling Authority. en-us Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398985 The Appellate Authority upheld the ruling that the services provided by the Appellant were not classified as Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services but rather as "rental services of transport vehicles." Consequently, the Appellant was not entitled to charge GST at 12% under the forward charge mechanism. The appeal filed by the Appellant was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Maharashtra Advance Ruling Authority. Case-Laws GST Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398985