<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1097 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398978</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not charge late filing fees under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015, whether through intimations under section 200A or rectification orders under section 154. The demands raised for such fees were deemed invalid and deleted, as the amendment to section 200A(1) was considered prospective and not applicable to periods preceding its effective date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:20:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1097 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398978</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not charge late filing fees under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015, whether through intimations under section 200A or rectification orders under section 154. The demands raised for such fees were deemed invalid and deleted, as the amendment to section 200A(1) was considered prospective and not applicable to periods preceding its effective date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>