<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1092 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398973</link>
    <description>The Appellant failed to file TDS returns on time, leading to penalty proceedings under section 272A(2)(k). The Appellant cited the managing director&#039;s ill-health for delays in TDS deposit. The Ld.AO imposed penalties based on delay duration. The Ld.CIT(A) upheld penalties stressing timely TDS submissions. The Appellant attributed delays to accountant unavailability. The ITAT partially allowed appeals, directing penalties from TDS deposit date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1092 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398973</link>
      <description>The Appellant failed to file TDS returns on time, leading to penalty proceedings under section 272A(2)(k). The Appellant cited the managing director&#039;s ill-health for delays in TDS deposit. The Ld.AO imposed penalties based on delay duration. The Ld.CIT(A) upheld penalties stressing timely TDS submissions. The Appellant attributed delays to accountant unavailability. The ITAT partially allowed appeals, directing penalties from TDS deposit date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>