<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1063 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398944</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the order taking cognizance under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act due to a delay in filing the complaint, emphasizing the necessity of considering limitation periods and providing the accused with an opportunity to present their case before condoning delays in legal proceedings. The court directed the Magistrate to reconsider the reasons for the delay and ensure proper procedures are followed before making any decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:23:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1063 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398944</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the order taking cognizance under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act due to a delay in filing the complaint, emphasizing the necessity of considering limitation periods and providing the accused with an opportunity to present their case before condoning delays in legal proceedings. The court directed the Magistrate to reconsider the reasons for the delay and ensure proper procedures are followed before making any decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>