https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398943 The Criminal Revision was allowed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. The delay in filing the revision application was condoned, leading to its registration. The petitioner's challenge to the judgment of conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was affirmed by the Appellate Court. The offence under Section 138 of the Act was compounded, quashing all proceedings, upon payment of compensation. The judge emphasized the need to honor business transactions and avoid unnecessary incarceration for bounced cheques. The petitioner was acquitted, with directions to comply with specified conditions, discharge bail bonds, and make necessary payments. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Sep 2020 06:23:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398943 The Criminal Revision was allowed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh. The delay in filing the revision application was condoned, leading to its registration. The petitioner's challenge to the judgment of conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was affirmed by the Appellate Court. The offence under Section 138 of the Act was compounded, quashing all proceedings, upon payment of compensation. The judge emphasized the need to honor business transactions and avoid unnecessary incarceration for bounced cheques. The petitioner was acquitted, with directions to comply with specified conditions, discharge bail bonds, and make necessary payments. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398943