<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 400 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290475</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the judgment dismissing the writ proceedings, finding the appellant had not complied with the terms and conditions of the statutory contract with the West Bengal Housing Board. The Court allowed the appellant a four-week opportunity to comply, maintaining the status quo for eight weeks. The Board&#039;s cancellation of the allotment was deemed valid due to the appellant&#039;s failure to meet requirements, but reconsideration was mandated upon compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:24:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 400 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290475</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the judgment dismissing the writ proceedings, finding the appellant had not complied with the terms and conditions of the statutory contract with the West Bengal Housing Board. The Court allowed the appellant a four-week opportunity to comply, maintaining the status quo for eight weeks. The Board&#039;s cancellation of the allotment was deemed valid due to the appellant&#039;s failure to meet requirements, but reconsideration was mandated upon compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>