<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (10) TMI 46 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290460</link>
    <description>Minimum-wage fixation under the Minimum Wages Act does not, by itself, oust adjudication of an industrial wage dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act, because the two statutes operate in different fields and implied repeal is not presumed absent clear repugnancy. The status of maistries and kole maistries as workmen depends on the duties actually performed, so that question is for the Tribunal on evidence. A bonus reference for 1949-50 was not maintainable once the dispute had already been settled and no live industrial dispute remained. A later memorandum described as an amendment was treated as a valid fresh reference in substance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (10) TMI 46 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290460</link>
      <description>Minimum-wage fixation under the Minimum Wages Act does not, by itself, oust adjudication of an industrial wage dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act, because the two statutes operate in different fields and implied repeal is not presumed absent clear repugnancy. The status of maistries and kole maistries as workmen depends on the duties actually performed, so that question is for the Tribunal on evidence. A bonus reference for 1949-50 was not maintainable once the dispute had already been settled and no live industrial dispute remained. A later memorandum described as an amendment was treated as a valid fresh reference in substance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>