<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Lawyer&#039;s Location Shouldn&#039;t Affect GST Investigation Proceedings Location Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54943</link>
    <description>Territorial Jurisdiction - transfer of the case - GST investigation - The officer at Ernakulam has been authorised to look into the matter specifically on the grounds stated in the statement. We do not think that the location of the lawyer can at all be a reason for the department to carry out proceedings in a particular place. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:47:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:47:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Lawyer&#039;s Location Shouldn&#039;t Affect GST Investigation Proceedings Location Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54943</link>
      <description>Territorial Jurisdiction - transfer of the case - GST investigation - The officer at Ernakulam has been authorised to look into the matter specifically on the grounds stated in the statement. We do not think that the location of the lawyer can at all be a reason for the department to carry out proceedings in a particular place. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:47:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>