<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1060 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398941</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision not to transfer the investigation proceedings of a jewellery business group concern from Ernakulam to Kollam due to COVID-19 and logistical reasons. The court emphasized the Department&#039;s authority in choosing the investigating officer and venue, dismissing the appellants&#039; arguments for a transfer based on practical constraints and the officer&#039;s suitability at the current location. The refusal to transfer was affirmed, granting time for digital production of books of accounts as directed by the Single Judge. Writ Appeals were dismissed, maintaining the Department&#039;s discretion in the investigation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1060 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398941</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision not to transfer the investigation proceedings of a jewellery business group concern from Ernakulam to Kollam due to COVID-19 and logistical reasons. The court emphasized the Department&#039;s authority in choosing the investigating officer and venue, dismissing the appellants&#039; arguments for a transfer based on practical constraints and the officer&#039;s suitability at the current location. The refusal to transfer was affirmed, granting time for digital production of books of accounts as directed by the Single Judge. Writ Appeals were dismissed, maintaining the Department&#039;s discretion in the investigation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>