<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1057 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398938</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petition, directing the respondents to refund the tax, penalty, and interest collected from the petitioner. The detention and subsequent collection of tax and penalty were deemed unjustified as the transaction was a stock transfer, not a sale, under the GST regime. The judgment emphasized the importance of verifying registration details and conducting due diligence before imposing tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2021 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1057 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398938</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petition, directing the respondents to refund the tax, penalty, and interest collected from the petitioner. The detention and subsequent collection of tax and penalty were deemed unjustified as the transaction was a stock transfer, not a sale, under the GST regime. The judgment emphasized the importance of verifying registration details and conducting due diligence before imposing tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>