<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1056 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398937</link>
    <description>The High Court refused to quash the writ petitions filed by the milk producers challenging communications from the Additional Assistant Director DGGI. The court noted that the investigation was ongoing, no demand had been raised, and the communication only sought particulars. The court stated that any further action would be taken in accordance with the law after hearing the petitioner and closed the writ petitions without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:45:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1056 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398937</link>
      <description>The High Court refused to quash the writ petitions filed by the milk producers challenging communications from the Additional Assistant Director DGGI. The court noted that the investigation was ongoing, no demand had been raised, and the communication only sought particulars. The court stated that any further action would be taken in accordance with the law after hearing the petitioner and closed the writ petitions without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>