https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398934 The court found that the assessment order violated principles of natural justice by not providing the petitioner with necessary information, rendering it ex parte. Despite the availability of an alternative remedy, the court deemed the petition maintainable under Article 226 due to the breach of natural justice. The assessment order and subsequent recovery actions were deemed invalid, leading to the direction for the respondent to lift the bank attachment and refund the appropriated amount. The Assessing Officer was granted twelve months from the court's order receipt to pass a fresh assessment. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398934 The court found that the assessment order violated principles of natural justice by not providing the petitioner with necessary information, rendering it ex parte. Despite the availability of an alternative remedy, the court deemed the petition maintainable under Article 226 due to the breach of natural justice. The assessment order and subsequent recovery actions were deemed invalid, leading to the direction for the respondent to lift the bank attachment and refund the appropriated amount. The Assessing Officer was granted twelve months from the court's order receipt to pass a fresh assessment. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398934