<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1051 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398932</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the exclusion of certain comparables due to functional dissimilarity and the re-examination of others based on the turnover filter. The ground related to the working capital adjustment was rejected. The judgment emphasizes the significance of functional similarity in selecting comparables and the importance of adhering to DRP directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:44:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1051 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398932</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the exclusion of certain comparables due to functional dissimilarity and the re-examination of others based on the turnover filter. The ground related to the working capital adjustment was rejected. The judgment emphasizes the significance of functional similarity in selecting comparables and the importance of adhering to DRP directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>