<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 32 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23342</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Department&#039;s appeal and allow the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the valuation of a seized diamond ring. The court emphasized that the issues were factual in nature and supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings based on the evidence presented. It noted discrepancies in valuation reports and lack of concrete evidence to prove the seized ring differed from previous assessments. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s authority in factual determinations and evidentiary assessments, denying the applications for reference to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:53:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 32 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23342</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Department&#039;s appeal and allow the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the valuation of a seized diamond ring. The court emphasized that the issues were factual in nature and supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings based on the evidence presented. It noted discrepancies in valuation reports and lack of concrete evidence to prove the seized ring differed from previous assessments. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s authority in factual determinations and evidentiary assessments, denying the applications for reference to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>