<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1040 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal relied on evidence from a previous assessment year to establish the genuineness of the transaction involving a loan from the son-in-law, leading to the deletion of the amount added as unexplained income. The decision emphasized the acknowledgment of the son-in-law&#039;s creditworthiness in the earlier assessment, supporting the Assessee&#039;s position and ruling in favor of the Assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1040 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal relied on evidence from a previous assessment year to establish the genuineness of the transaction involving a loan from the son-in-law, leading to the deletion of the amount added as unexplained income. The decision emphasized the acknowledgment of the son-in-law&#039;s creditworthiness in the earlier assessment, supporting the Assessee&#039;s position and ruling in favor of the Assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>