<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1039 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398920</link>
    <description>The court determined that bringing a vehicle under temporary privilege does not constitute import. The petitioner was directed to pay customs duty as per government policies and Circulars. The court advised the petitioner to utilize the appellate mechanism under the Customs Act before pursuing further legal action. The writ petition was disposed of, emphasizing the importance of following the proper appellate process for resolving customs duty disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:43:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1039 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398920</link>
      <description>The court determined that bringing a vehicle under temporary privilege does not constitute import. The petitioner was directed to pay customs duty as per government policies and Circulars. The court advised the petitioner to utilize the appellate mechanism under the Customs Act before pursuing further legal action. The writ petition was disposed of, emphasizing the importance of following the proper appellate process for resolving customs duty disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>