https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398909 The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court's judgment of acquittal. The complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint was deemed non-maintainable as it was filed in the complainant's personal capacity without proper authorization from the firm involved. The High Court found no grounds to interfere with the trial court's decision, ultimately upholding the acquittal of the accused. en-us Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 27 Sep 2020 17:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398909 The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the trial court's judgment of acquittal. The complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint was deemed non-maintainable as it was filed in the complainant's personal capacity without proper authorization from the firm involved. The High Court found no grounds to interfere with the trial court's decision, ultimately upholding the acquittal of the accused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398909