<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1027 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398908</link>
    <description>The court accepted the petition challenging an Input Tax Credit block and notice citing a mismatch. It directed the matter to be treated as a representation to respondent no.1, who was instructed to decide within four weeks after a hearing. The status quo regarding the notice was to be maintained until then. The writ petition and application were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2020 13:50:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1027 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398908</link>
      <description>The court accepted the petition challenging an Input Tax Credit block and notice citing a mismatch. It directed the matter to be treated as a representation to respondent no.1, who was instructed to decide within four weeks after a hearing. The status quo regarding the notice was to be maintained until then. The writ petition and application were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>