<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1017 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398898</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment order under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. It found that the reassessment beyond four years was not justified as there was no fresh tangible material to warrant reopening under the first proviso to Section 147. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and answering the substantial questions of law against them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1017 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398898</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment order under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. It found that the reassessment beyond four years was not justified as there was no fresh tangible material to warrant reopening under the first proviso to Section 147. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and answering the substantial questions of law against them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>