<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revision Order u/s 263 Upheld Due to Incorrect Deduction Allowance u/s 80P2(d) by Assessing Officer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54929</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - the assessee made no specific claim u/s. 80P2(d) of the Act before the AO nor in the return of income as rightly pointed by the ld. DR. - Further, AO on incorrect assumptions of facts without applying correct application of law allowed deduction u/s. 80P2(d) of the Act which clearly reflects non application of mind. - Revision order sustained - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2020 13:34:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2020 13:34:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revision Order u/s 263 Upheld Due to Incorrect Deduction Allowance u/s 80P2(d) by Assessing Officer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54929</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - the assessee made no specific claim u/s. 80P2(d) of the Act before the AO nor in the return of income as rightly pointed by the ld. DR. - Further, AO on incorrect assumptions of facts without applying correct application of law allowed deduction u/s. 80P2(d) of the Act which clearly reflects non application of mind. - Revision order sustained - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2020 13:34:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>