<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 29 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23336</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision not to grant a stay of reassessment proceedings, emphasizing the balance of convenience favored the Revenue due to the age of assessments and potential multiplicity of proceedings. The Court concluded that the Tribunal lacked the power to grant a stay and dismissed the petition without costs, rejecting the oral application for a stay of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:32:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 29 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23336</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision not to grant a stay of reassessment proceedings, emphasizing the balance of convenience favored the Revenue due to the age of assessments and potential multiplicity of proceedings. The Court concluded that the Tribunal lacked the power to grant a stay and dismissed the petition without costs, rejecting the oral application for a stay of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>