<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 31 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23335</link>
    <description>Where the fact-finding authorities accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that tax had been deducted at source and advance tax paid, so it bona fide believed filing the return was unnecessary, deletion of penalty for delayed filing was sustained under section 271(1)(a). The Court treated the acceptance of bona fide belief and reasonable cause as a factual determination, and held that the Revenue&#039;s reliance on absence of mens rea did not show any legal error. As the concurrent findings disclosed no question of law, no referable question arose under section 256(2) and the reference application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 31 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23335</link>
      <description>Where the fact-finding authorities accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation that tax had been deducted at source and advance tax paid, so it bona fide believed filing the return was unnecessary, deletion of penalty for delayed filing was sustained under section 271(1)(a). The Court treated the acceptance of bona fide belief and reasonable cause as a factual determination, and held that the Revenue&#039;s reliance on absence of mens rea did not show any legal error. As the concurrent findings disclosed no question of law, no referable question arose under section 256(2) and the reference application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>