<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Misinterpretation of Exemption Circular: Clause 5.5 Comma Misleading, Holistic Reading Needed for Accurate Understanding.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54925</link>
    <description>Interpretation of the Exemption Circular - the emphasis on the comma punctuation mark (,) used in Clause 5.5 of the Circular dated 23.03.2009 to be misdirected. The stress given to this separator is entirely out of context. The surrounding words both preceding and succeeding the comma have to be read together to give a complete meaning. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2020 11:42:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2020 11:42:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Misinterpretation of Exemption Circular: Clause 5.5 Comma Misleading, Holistic Reading Needed for Accurate Understanding.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54925</link>
      <description>Interpretation of the Exemption Circular - the emphasis on the comma punctuation mark (,) used in Clause 5.5 of the Circular dated 23.03.2009 to be misdirected. The stress given to this separator is entirely out of context. The surrounding words both preceding and succeeding the comma have to be read together to give a complete meaning. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2020 11:42:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>