<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 996 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. It found that the financial creditors did not provide evidence of a validly executed Unit Buyer&#039;s Agreement, necessary for the assured returns to be due. As a result, the Tribunal ruled that the debt had not matured, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2020 11:41:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 996 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor. It found that the financial creditors did not provide evidence of a validly executed Unit Buyer&#039;s Agreement, necessary for the assured returns to be due. As a result, the Tribunal ruled that the debt had not matured, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>