<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 990 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398871</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the previous e-auction process as it did not maximize the value of the assets of the corporate debtor. A new bid was accepted, with the condition that the balance amount must be deposited within six weeks. The application challenging the auction process was allowed, and the new bidder was declared successful, ensuring a higher value for the assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2020 11:41:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=623321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 990 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398871</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the previous e-auction process as it did not maximize the value of the assets of the corporate debtor. A new bid was accepted, with the condition that the balance amount must be deposited within six weeks. The application challenging the auction process was allowed, and the new bidder was declared successful, ensuring a higher value for the assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>